vialroom

#other-peptides 2026-04-29

Wednesday45 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • truncation_tru — ran GHK-Cu for 17 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind 20:10
  • two_four_ceiling — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing 20:47
  • verify_or_dont — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else 22:28
  • boots_supply — i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve, n of 1 obviously my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across… 23:04
  • truncation_tru — is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent 23:07
20:09ferrous_ash pinned a message
TT

ran GHK-Cu for 17 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind

💀7👍15

sorry to jump in reconstituted 40 in 5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with

20:13ferrous_ash pinned a message

rodent data only

📈1👀6
CO

nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing

CO

GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting

TF

purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 99 on another

no human data

secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening

TF

BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing

😂6👍8
KF

ran TB-500 alone for 18 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, not advice obviously

👀11🧪1😂1

update on the earlier thing cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 7.4 degrees

i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back

back after 25 months, has any actual data landed on BPC

for the archive the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult

ran one thing at a time for 8 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring, n of 1 obviously

is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything

is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work

tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating

KF

whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication

22:01ferrous_ash pinned a message to this channel

sceptical but curious

VO

i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included

👍6
VO

oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same, still working it out

the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else

🧊18
BS

tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, still working it out

TT

unrelated but the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support

update on the earlier thing anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline

BS

i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve, n of 1 obviously
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time

🔥14😂1

the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them