stacked, learned nothing
#other-peptides 2026-04-13
- meal_prep_mick — changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable 19:13
- willow_waits — tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating, thats just me 20:47
- meal_prep_mick — for the archive the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them 21:11
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log, ymmv
ran GHK-Cu for 29 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
Archive lookup: secretagogue_sy first appears in this channel on 2025-07-09.
does anyone have a Medutest result for a ERP BPC lot
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
quick one anyone had a purity result under 97.4 on one of these
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support, we shall see
TB-500 did nothing for me over 11 weeks and i stand by that a year later
rodent data only
evidence is thin
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
update on the earlier thing cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 3.1 degrees
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
quick one came back after 5 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.1 on one lot and 99 on another
ran TB-500 alone for 30 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, thats just me
no human data
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating, thats just me
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, i could be wrong
for the archive the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
sceptical but curious