no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
VendorInvestigate came back 97.4 on a SWB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
#other-peptides 2026-03-30
Monday18 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- typosquat_tay — took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log 19:08
- typosquat_tay — the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult 19:15
- area_percent — is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it 19:45
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
cant tell honestly
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
⚠️7💀6
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
🎉4😂5
baseline month helped
💀1📉17
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
🤝3🧊4✅4
reconstituted 30 in 2ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
back after 20 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
quick one changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
anyone reconstituted a 40 vial of these to 8 and had it stay clear
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it, ymmv
placebo maybe
fridge-temps.csv
669 rows · not retained in the public archive
⚠️16👍4
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing