how do people test purity on these, does Medutest even take them
#other-peptides 2026-03-27
Friday46 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- fake_tracking — took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log, your mileage will differ my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got… 21:06
- coa_or_cope — for the archive does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a JEEP BPC lot 21:10
- coa_or_cope — the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them 21:33
- acer_asks — the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not,… 21:41
- void_volume — Janoshik came back 99.4 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 22:28
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
reconstituted 40 in 3ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
placebo maybe
stacked, learned nothing
ok so are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
ran it alone
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
did nothing for me
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log, your mileage will differ
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
for the archive does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a JEEP BPC lot
injuries heal anyway
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
evidence is thin
one thing at a time
🤝3📈13
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
🙏16✅10
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support, thats one data point
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
📈18📉7😂1
get it tested
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
ran TB-500 alone for 11 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
came back after 18 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, n of 1 obviously
cant tell honestly
baseline month helped
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
verification channel has some
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable, take that with a pinch of salt
TB-500 did nothing for me over 11 weeks and i stand by that a year later, someone check my working
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
Janoshik came back 99.4 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
i stacked three things for 23 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
anyone reconstituted a 30 vial of these to 8 and had it stay clear
rodent data only
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
ran GHK-Cu for 15 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
sceptical but curious
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.4 on one lot and 99.2 on another, your mileage will differ