right so anyone had a purity result under 96.8 on one of these
#other-peptides 2026-03-11
Wednesday34 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- salt_bridge — how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically 18:17
- elm_escalates — one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks 19:02
- closer_not_simpler — reconstituted 10 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with 19:52
- elm_escalates — ran one thing at a time for 7 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring 19:56
back after 19 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
cant tell honestly
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
[edited]GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
sorry to jump in tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
came back after 15 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
coa-c-4402.pdf
1 page · 755 KB · not retained in the public archive
i stacked three things for 18 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
no human data
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
🤝1❤️15😂9
did nothing for me
[edited]does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a MKM BPC lot
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
stacked, learned nothing
😂6🎉1
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
✅1👍9
reconstituted 10 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
🧊18👀2
PeptideMeter came back 99.2 on a FGP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
ran one thing at a time for 7 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
⚠️3👍1📈10
sorry to jump in anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
verification channel has some
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
baseline month helped
📈1✅6
ok so BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
🧊4🤝2
right so purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.4 on one lot and 98.1 on another
get it tested
coa-h-2814.pdf
1 page · 365 KB · not retained in the public archive
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
🙏4😂1
coming back to this took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
slightly off topic but anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting