no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
#other-peptides 2026-03-08
Sunday39 messages10 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- VialBot — New independent result logged — HJ, lot A-2601, purity 99.4% (Medutest). 01:09
- retention_time — update on the earlier thing ran TB-500 alone for 16 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened 01:44
- vialkeeper — Janoshik came back 97.4 on a SWB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, we shall see ran one thing at a time for 5 years and ended… 04:43
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
baseline month helped
🙏6👀2
New independent result logged — HJ, lot A-2601, purity 99.4% (Medutest).
💀18🧊7
follow up one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
update on the earlier thing ran TB-500 alone for 16 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
😂2🧊10📉2
back after 26 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
update on the earlier thing nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
Batch lookup SG-1177: 3 independent reports on file, earliest 2025-10-25.
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees
Janoshik came back 97.4 on a SWB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, we shall see
ran one thing at a time for 5 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
medutest-report-h-2814.pdf
3 pages · 147 KB · not retained in the public archive
injuries heal anyway
😂14
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
reconstituted 2 in 1.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
TB-500 did nothing for me over 26 weeks and i stand by that a year later
placebo maybe
verification channel has some
rodent data only
quick one the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
slightly off topic but anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
🎉10
Recon calculator: 40mg in 3ml = 8mg/ml.
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
did nothing for me
[edited]while im here GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, for what its worth
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
get it tested
sceptical but curious
one thing at a time
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 20 months and never came back
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
TB-500 did nothing for me over 28 weeks and i stand by that a year later
no human data