while im here BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, ill dig out the number
#other-peptides 2026-03-02
- ruo_only — while im here BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, ill dig out the number 21:53
- dublin_dose — does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels 22:09
- ruo_only — how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically 22:17
- lisbon_lot — follow up anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline 22:39
- reta_low_dose — VendorInvestigate came back 96.8 on a QSC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 22:54
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable, ymmv
[edited]does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening, take that with a pinch of salt
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, ymmv
[edited]follow up anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
stacked, learned nothing
anyone reconstituted a 10 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear
VendorInvestigate came back 96.8 on a QSC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
verification channel has some
sorry to jump in anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting