is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
#other-peptides 2026-02-17
Tuesday22 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- van_isle_vial — follow up came back after 3 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted 19:55
- dark_for_ten_days — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling 20:30
- van_isle_vial — the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult 21:01
- sage_sources — quick one cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 7.4 degrees 21:31
- sage_sources — GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit… 22:24
did nothing for me
follow up came back after 3 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
one thing at a time
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
💀1
TB-500 did nothing for me over 7 weeks and i stand by that a year later
back after 25 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
✅5💀12
verification channel has some
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
dark_for_ten_daysone variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of…
i stacked three things for 20 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
quick one cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 7.4 degrees
baseline month helped
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
rodent data only
evidence is thin
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this