evidence is thin
#other-peptides 2026-01-07
- septum_sal — does anyone have a Janoshik result for a BCH BPC lot 13:09
- karl_fischer — if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it 13:33
- stack_sceptic — anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something 14:06
- karl_fischer — ran TB-500 alone for 17 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened 14:09
- triple_ag_tom — my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time 16:26
one thing at a time
i stacked three things for 15 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, we shall see
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
baseline month helped
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
placebo maybe
quick one is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
sorry to jump in no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a BCH BPC lot
sceptical but curious
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, i have it written down somewhere
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
how do people test purity on these, does PeptideMeter even take them
cant tell honestly
anyone had a purity result under 98.1 on one of these
ran one thing at a time for 4 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
stacked, learned nothing
back after 1 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
ran TB-500 alone for 17 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
ok so changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
did nothing for me
[edited]does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
ran it alone
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
verification channel has some
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
rodent data only
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this, anyway
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 5.6 degrees
injuries heal anyway
TB-500 did nothing for me over 9 weeks and i stand by that a year later
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway