is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
#other-peptides 2026-01-03
Saturday51 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- thirty_min_wait — took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log 10:53
- zed_zeroes_in — GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser 12:09
- protein_floor — GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting 13:47
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
📈3🙏1
did nothing for me
🤝6
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
rodent data only
ran TB-500 alone for 28 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, from memory
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
VendorInvestigate came back 99.2 on a QST lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
i stacked three things for 4 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
Reminder for first_month_fi: dose day is today. Set 4 days ago.
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
Channel stats, last 30 days: 111 messages from 26 members.
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
✅1💀11
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
[edited]ran it alone
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4 degrees
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks, for what its worth
while im here is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
ran one thing at a time for 8 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
janoshik-sg-1177.pdf
2 pages · 140 KB · not retained in the public archive
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
🧊10
verification channel has some
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
coa-a-2418.pdf
1 page · 456 KB · not retained in the public archive
how do people test purity on these, does PeptideMeter even take them
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
slightly off topic but how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
anyone had a purity result under 96.8 on one of these
came back after 21 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
baseline month helped
evidence is thin
one thing at a time
😂1📈2
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
🙏14💀8⚠️6
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 98.1 on another
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
placebo maybe
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
right so is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
right so back after 12 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 24 months and never came back
cant tell honestly