tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
#other-peptides 2025-12-06
Saturday26 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- u100_pat — Janoshik came back 99 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, i think 19:55
- u100_pat — one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks 19:56
- chain_of_custody — is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything 20:13
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
sceptical but curious
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a TFC BPC lot
Janoshik came back 99 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, i think
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
fridge-temps.csv
653 rows · not retained in the public archive
placebo maybe
🎉11
injuries heal anyway
🎉3📈12👍15
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
✅16🤝4⚠️7
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 4 months and never came back
stacked, learned nothing
one thing at a time
while im here back after 11 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
slightly off topic but whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
rodent data only
no human data
verification channel has some
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
cant tell honestly
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline