how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
#other-peptides 2025-11-29
- otto_swirls — slightly off topic but is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent 19:47
- otto_swirls — i stacked three things for 8 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing 19:57
- half_life_hal — unrelated but purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.6 on one lot and 98.1 on another, n of 1 obviously 19:58
- monoisotopic — GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting 20:37
- monoisotopic — ran GHK-Cu for 26 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind 20:59
verification channel has some
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
slightly off topic but is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
i stacked three things for 8 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
unrelated but purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.6 on one lot and 98.1 on another, n of 1 obviously
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
reconstituted 5 in 5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
injuries heal anyway
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
sceptical but curious
came back after 19 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, your mileage will differ
[edited]evidence is thin
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
ran GHK-Cu for 26 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
one thing at a time
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve, take that with a pinch of salt
update on the earlier thing does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
ran it alone