slightly off topic but tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating, from memory
#other-peptides 2025-11-03
Monday24 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- first_and_last_four — update on the earlier thing my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time 15:50
- factory_direct_fi — is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it 16:12
- factory_direct_fi — i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included 16:17
- reta_resting_hr — is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones 16:50
did nothing for me
sceptical but curious
came back after 11 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
get it tested
rodent data only
ran it alone
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
baseline month helped
update on the earlier thing my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
🙏4
cant tell honestly
😂7
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
🎉15
no human data
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
👀5🙏17
verification channel has some
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
TB-500 did nothing for me over 19 weeks and i stand by that a year later
📈4
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
weights-monthly.csv
513 rows · not retained in the public archive
ran GHK-Cu for 16 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
back after 5 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
stacked, learned nothing