whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
#other-peptides 2025-09-13
- retention_time — ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring 11:22
- freeze_thaw — i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back 12:23
- typosquat_tay — is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones 12:39
- retention_time — unrelated but my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time 13:42
- freeze_thaw — GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting 13:47
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
VendorInvestigate came back 99 on a ERP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, for what its worth
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve, still working it out
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
ran TB-500 alone for 18 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
came back after 26 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
no human data
unrelated but reconstituted 20 in 3ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
evidence is thin
ran GHK-Cu for 14 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
sorry to jump in anyone had a purity result under 97.4 on one of these
cant tell honestly
one thing at a time
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 6.2 degrees
back after 2 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
unrelated but my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log, not advice obviously
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
injuries heal anyway
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels