no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
#other-peptides 2025-09-06
Saturday36 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- residual_solvent — GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting 21:36
- ghent_gradient — slightly off topic but the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them 22:09
- karl_fischer — the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support 22:21
- residual_solvent — update on the earlier thing my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time 22:32
- careful_claims — while im here ran TB-500 alone for 24 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened 23:10
no human data
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
[edited]the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
🤝9
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 98.1 on another
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
⚠️10❤️16
VendorInvestigate came back 98.1 on a FGP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
📈1
ok so ran GHK-Cu for 26 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
On this day 6 years ago this channel logged 58 messages.
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
slightly off topic but the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
❤️12👀18👍2
evidence is thin
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable, i think
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 7.4 degrees
how do people test purity on these, does PeptideMeter even take them
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
😂3📉14
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
🧪13
coming back to this ran one thing at a time for 5 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
update on the earlier thing my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
😂8🤝17
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
🎉1👍8
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
did nothing for me
anyone reconstituted a 2 vial of these to 2 and had it stay clear
quick one i stacked three things for 18 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
unrelated but is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
while im here ran TB-500 alone for 24 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
😂17
placebo maybe