anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
#other-peptides 2025-08-25
Monday33 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- nordic_price_nils — anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something 18:46
- nordic_price_nils — TB-500 did nothing for me over 18 weeks and i stand by that a year later 18:54
- gall_bladder_gav — people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this 20:30
genuine question back after 1 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
Medutest came back 96.8 on a WXT lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, i could be wrong
cant tell honestly
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
👀3🎉11
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
💀6🎉1✅9
TB-500 did nothing for me over 18 weeks and i stand by that a year later
💀12✅4
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
👍3😂5
rodent data only
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, for what its worth
injuries heal anyway
i stacked three things for 8 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
follow up no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
✅1⚠️13
evidence is thin
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
Verification log updated: FGP — evidence added, status unchanged.
ran TB-500 alone for 33 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
while im here does anyone have a Medutest result for a SWB BPC lot
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
📉4🎉13❤️2
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
ok so tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating, ymmv
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
ran GHK-Cu for 33 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
vial-b-0329-front.png
900 × 1200 · 603 KB · not retained in the public archive
ran it alone