evidence is thin
#other-peptides 2025-07-26
Saturday22 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- power_cut_pia — for the archive GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, for what its worth 15:03
- surpass_two — update on the earlier thing ran TB-500 alone for 28 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened 17:24
- VialBot — New independent result logged — Homopeptide, lot H-2814, purity 97.4% (Janoshik). 18:18
baseline month helped
stacked, learned nothing
for the archive GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, for what its worth
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
verification channel has some
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
TB-500 did nothing for me over 16 weeks and i stand by that a year later, not advice obviously
placebo maybe
reconstituted 30 in 2ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
get it tested
cant tell honestly
did nothing for me
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable, thats just me
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
update on the earlier thing ran TB-500 alone for 28 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve, someone check my working
how do people test purity on these, does VendorInvestigate even take them
rodent data only
🤝12
New independent result logged — Homopeptide, lot H-2814, purity 97.4% (Janoshik).