reconstituted 40 in 2ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
#other-peptides 2025-07-10
Thursday20 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- void_volume — quick one came back after 10 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted 21:55
- batch_bandit — unrelated but i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back 22:41
- batch_bandit — coming back to this ran TB-500 alone for 14 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened 22:55
quick one came back after 10 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
no human data
injuries heal anyway
unrelated but i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
stacked, learned nothing
👍12
coming back to this ran TB-500 alone for 14 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
rodent data only
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
ran it alone