i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, n of 1 obviously
#other-peptides 2025-05-31
- apnoea_down_two — quick one my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time 11:39
- mag_citrate — the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them 13:15
- mag_citrate — sorry to jump in i stacked three things for 10 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing 14:07
- tare_weight — anyone reconstituted a 15 vial of these to 2.5 and had it stay clear 18:05
*PeptideMeter not the other one
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
quick one my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
while im here back after 15 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
*PeptideMeter not the other one
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 19 months and never came back
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
ok so the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
rodent data only
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
sorry to jump in i stacked three things for 10 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
ran GHK-Cu for 30 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
placebo maybe
for the archive are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
sceptical but curious
ok so the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable, not advice obviously
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.6 on one lot and 97.4 on another
came back after 16 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
injuries heal anyway
TB-500 did nothing for me over 34 weeks and i stand by that a year later
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
anyone reconstituted a 15 vial of these to 2.5 and had it stay clear
how do people test purity on these, does PeptideMeter even take them