ran it alone
[edited]chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 733 KB · not retained in the public archive
#other-peptides 2025-05-04
Sunday22 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
Digest for the week of 2025-02-21 has been published.
reconstituted 30 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with, anyway
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
back after 11 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
[edited]i stacked three things for 1 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
❤️14
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
[edited]🧪1🧊2
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
[edited]*PeptideMeter not the other one
one thing at a time
anyone had a purity result under 98.6 on one of these
🤝1👀14
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a SWB BPC lot
TB-500 did nothing for me over 11 weeks and i stand by that a year later
🧪5😂13
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
get it tested
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same, i could be wrong
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log