tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
#other-peptides 2025-03-06
Thursday11 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- area_percent — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling 19:11
- c18_column — follow up the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, i could be wrong 19:13
- area_percent — anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting 19:16
- c18_column — no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past, still working it out 19:17
- c18_column — slightly off topic but PeptideMeter came back 99.2 on a GGPeps lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 19:57
follow up the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, i could be wrong
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
📉1🧊1
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past, still working it out
slightly off topic but PeptideMeter came back 99.2 on a GGPeps lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
⚠️5
one thing at a time
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
ran one thing at a time for 9 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
sorry to jump in are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all