GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
#other-peptides 2025-02-27
Thursday30 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- brisbane_bac — PeptideMeter came back 98.1 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 08:22
- ring_size_down — ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring came back after 22 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so… 10:16
- ten_percent_off — update on the earlier thing i stacked three things for 22 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, i have it written down somewhere 10:17
- ten_percent_off — does anyone have a Janoshik result for a CPC BPC lot 10:48
- ring_size_down — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, not advice obviously 13:25
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
update on the earlier thing oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
PeptideMeter came back 98.1 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
📉6
anyone reconstituted a 2 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear
🔥2
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, thats just me
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, ymmv
quick one does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
right so people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
rodent data only
evidence is thin
ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
came back after 22 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
update on the earlier thing i stacked three things for 22 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, i have it written down somewhere
anyone had a purity result under 99.4 on one of these
ran TB-500 alone for 21 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
came back after 9 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a CPC BPC lot
baseline month helped
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
sceptical but curious
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
stacked, learned nothing
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
unrelated but ran GHK-Cu for 24 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
TB-500 did nothing for me over 18 weeks and i stand by that a year later
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, not advice obviously
👍5🤝11
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline