#other-peptides 2025-02-23

while im here Medutest came back 99.4 on a TFC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, anyway

quick one changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable, someone check my working

sceptical but curious

is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work

my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time

BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing

ran TB-500 alone for 12 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened

ran GHK-Cu for 29 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind

unrelated but does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels

Assay note: QST lot E-2205 reported at 99% of label content.

anyone had a purity result under 99 on one of these

evidence is thin

cant tell honestly

the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, i have it written down somewhere

came back after 1 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted

the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult, i think

baseline month helped

tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating

ran it alone

i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting

does anyone have a Medutest result for a SSA BPC lot