came back after 18 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
#other-peptides 2025-02-19
Wednesday41 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- alt_ast_ali — secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening 18:01
- plus_sixteen — whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication 18:34
- sharps_bin_sid — the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support 19:24
ran TB-500 alone for 31 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
👍1🙏3
follow up whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
[edited]VendorInvestigate came back 96.8 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
did nothing for me
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
✅1🧪11
one thing at a time
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing, i think
👀2📈8😂1
Inter-lab diff for lot F-1330: 97.4% vs 98.1%. Within expected range.
stacked, learned nothing
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
👀4📉12👍2
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, we shall see
*PeptideMeter not the other one
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
[edited]rodent data only
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 9 months and never came back, i think
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
sceptical but curious
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
cant tell honestly
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
🎉8💀9
slightly off topic but if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past, ask me again in a month
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
placebo maybe
🙏12📉7👍11
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
baseline month helped
coming back to this purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 96.8 on another
does anyone have a Medutest result for a GL Biochem BPC lot
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
TB-500 did nothing for me over 8 weeks and i stand by that a year later, for what its worth
evidence is thin
🤝3
ran GHK-Cu for 2 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
reconstituted 20 in 1.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
injuries heal anyway
🧊3