vialroom

#other-peptides 2025-01-12

Sunday21 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • noct.titrate — i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise… 17:07
  • noct.titrate — no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past 17:43
  • slow.taper — nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing, i have it written down somewhere 17:45
  • belfast_bac — oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same, your mileage will differ 17:51
  • amsterdam_aliquot — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else 17:52
NT

right so the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them

BB

BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing

sceptical but curious

BB

tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling

NT

i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it

⚠️7👍14
NT

no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past

🔥1📈16💀7

oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same, your mileage will differ

CO

GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser

whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication

for the archive is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work

how do people test purity on these, does Janoshik even take them