how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
#other-peptides 2024-11-10
Sunday27 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- marrow.mod — follow up anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting 18:40
- blind_submit — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling 18:50
- taper_or_not — PeptideMeter came back 98.1 on a CPC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 19:27
- madrid_mg — GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser PeptideMeter came back 96.8 on a JEEP lot, which tells you whats in the vial… 21:57
did nothing for me
unrelated but how do people test purity on these, does Medutest even take them
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
one thing at a time
anyone had a purity result under 98.6 on one of these
ran it alone
medutest-report-a-2601.pdf
3 pages · 460 KB · not retained in the public archive
placebo maybe
injuries heal anyway
follow up anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
⚠️1🙏7✅8
came back after 1 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 3.1 degrees
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
❤️1🙏2
ran TB-500 alone for 22 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
genuine question back after 2 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
PeptideMeter came back 98.1 on a CPC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
ok so does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
TB-500 did nothing for me over 34 weeks and i stand by that a year later
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
anyone reconstituted a 15 vial of these to 2.5 and had it stay clear
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
PeptideMeter came back 96.8 on a JEEP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
😂2🤝11