sceptical but curious
#other-peptides 2024-11-04
Monday27 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- taper_or_not — update on the earlier thing Medutest came back 98.6 on a HJ lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, still working it out 20:39
- typosquat_tay — the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, take that with a pinch of salt 20:57
- typosquat_tay — is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent 21:10
- typosquat_tay — update on the earlier thing secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening 21:22
- hair_month_four — GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser 22:31
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
ran TB-500 alone for 34 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
update on the earlier thing Medutest came back 98.6 on a HJ lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, still working it out
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
evidence is thin
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, take that with a pinch of salt
placebo maybe
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
🙏3📈16😂18
one thing at a time
update on the earlier thing secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
verification channel has some
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
baseline month helped
janoshik-kp-0925.pdf
2 pages · 192 KB · not retained in the public archive
came back after 18 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
stacked, learned nothing
cant tell honestly
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
for the archive does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
[redacted at member request] · archive policy
📈2
no human data
rodent data only
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
🙏3😂3
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating