vialroom

#other-peptides 2024-10-23

Wednesday19 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • nordic_price_nils — does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a TFC BPC lot Janoshik came back 99 on a QYB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 22:56
  • knees_first — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing 23:04
  • knees_first — whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication 23:22
  • knees_first — sorry to jump in the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult 23:23
  • knees_first — are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway 23:38

does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a TFC BPC lot
Janoshik came back 99 on a QYB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works

🤝1

ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring, anyway

is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work

KF

BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing

🤝3💀5🔥7

changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log

injuries heal anyway

does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see

sorry to jump in the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult

🔥9👀7
KF

coming back to this the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 4 months and never came back

sceptical but curious

are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway

janoshik-e-2205.pdf
2 pages · 310 KB · not retained in the public archive

the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy