no human data
#other-peptides 2024-06-01
Saturday30 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- rotate_the_site — came back after 24 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted 21:00
- rotate_the_site — ran GHK-Cu for 7 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind 21:09
- lot_number_lou — GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting 22:12
came back after 24 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
🔥9❤️7
cant tell honestly
ran TB-500 alone for 32 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
ran GHK-Cu for 7 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
fridge-temps.csv
391 rows · not retained in the public archive
injuries heal anyway
😂1
evidence is thin
baseline month helped
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
anyone reconstituted a 20 vial of these to 8 and had it stay clear
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
stacked, learned nothing
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 8 months and never came back
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 23 months and never came back
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, ask me again in a month
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
coming back to this anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
sceptical but curious
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
🧊9🎉4📈11
ran it alone
💀13🔥3🙏7
get it tested
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 97.4 on another
verification channel has some
Digest for the week of 2024-01-01 has been published.
rodent data only
janoshik-c-4402.pdf
2 pages · 787 KB · not retained in the public archive