chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup, thats just me
transit-times.csv
849 rows · not retained in the public archive
#lab-requests 2026-05-11
Monday24 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vik_verifies — chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup, thats just me 21:05
- VialBot — Verification log updated: SGN — evidence added, status unchanged. 21:11
- plus_sixteen — send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it 21:25
- VialBot — Verification log updated: WWB — evidence added, status unchanged. 21:26
who is coordinating this round
Verification log updated: SGN — evidence added, status unchanged.
whats the split
can i add a second lot to the same submission
whats the wording on the customs declaration for a sample
send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it
⚠️2🤝8
Verification log updated: WWB — evidence added, status unchanged.
😂5
how do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial
we have never had a lab mix up a sample. we have had members mix up their own labelling twice
i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests
👍3👀1🧪3
powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control
in for one
how many people do we need before the split is worth it
how long do you keep the retained half of the sample
whats the current turnaround, last one took 7 days
🔥1
if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer
add a standard
[edited]coming back to this do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt, i could be wrong
is there a preferred lab for quantity specifically
coordinating this round
queue is posted
is it worth including a reference standard in the batch