the split works from about 8 people. below that everyone pays more than the test is worth, someone check my working
#lab-requests 2026-02-07
- pharmac_pen — the split works from about 8 people. below that everyone pays more than the test is worth, someone check my working 01:34
- batch_bandit — i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing 01:42
- batch_bandit — VendorInvestigate has been the fastest for us. VendorInvestigate has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab 03:11
- blank_run — chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup 04:26
i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing
is it worth including a reference standard in the batch
while im here whats the current turnaround, last one took 18 days
publish the raw
we have never had a lab mix up a sample. we have had members mix up their own labelling twice
VendorInvestigate has been the fastest for us. VendorInvestigate has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab
including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process
roughly one sample in 4 rounds has gone missing in transit. budget for it emotionally
blinded obviously
how do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial
label the syringe
send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it
in for one
i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests, happy to be corrected
chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup
unrelated but can i add a second lot to the same submission
coming back to this how are we splitting the cost this time
[edited]code not name
i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones
we do not help with wording beyond that and the mods are strict about it
who is coordinating this round
[edited]thats the turnaround