#lab-requests 2025-10-23

Thursday38 messages8 participantstimes are UTC

Highlights from this day

VialBot — Purity check: no report on file for lot E-2205. Nothing logged either way. 18:10
VialBot — Verification log updated: TFC — evidence added, status unchanged. 18:23
power_through_no — do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt 18:42
peak_split — is there a submission going out this month and can i get in on it 19:28

blank_runlab16:30

i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing, we shall see

blank_runlab16:37

a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement

two labs on the same lot is a luxury but it is how we learned what inter-lab variance looks like, i think

declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is

🎉3

declared_value 16:42

including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process

blank_runlab16:48

publish the raw

🔥1

blank_runlab17:01

anyone want to co-fund a quantity test on a lot i already own

blank_runlab17:14

keep half back

weights-monthly.csv

212 rows · not retained in the public archive

🧊18😂15❤️1

declared_value 17:27

do i send a syringe or the whole vial

swab_dry_first 17:28

we have never had a lab mix up a sample. we have had members mix up their own labelling twice

swab_dry_first 17:41

send powder

swab_dry_first 17:54

whats the wording on the customs declaration for a sample

swab_dry_first 18:08

powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control

✅2💀1

VialBotbot18:10

Purity check: no report on file for lot E-2205. Nothing logged either way.

swab_dry_first 18:11

Janoshik has been the fastest for us. VendorInvestigate has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab

18:16quiet.hours pinned a message to this channel

swab_dry_first 18:17

do we publish the raw report or a summary

while im here how are we splitting the cost this time

is it worth including a reference standard in the batch

VialBotbot18:23

Verification log updated: TFC — evidence added, status unchanged.

😂10🤝4

assay_not_puritylab18:27

queue is posted

power_through_no 18:42

do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt

🔥3❤️11

18:43quiet.hours pinned a message

power_through_no 18:45

if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer

assay_not_puritylab18:47

update from 1 months ago: the blinding process is unchanged and it has held up fine

slightly off topic but how many people do we need before the split is worth it

power_through_no 18:51

add a standard

assay_not_puritylab18:52

whats the current turnaround, last one took 17 days

blank_runlab18:55

can i add a second lot to the same submission

peak_splitlab19:28

is there a submission going out this month and can i get in on it

❤️3🧊11

assay_not_puritylab19:35

roughly one sample in 8 rounds has gone missing in transit. budget for it emotionally

blank_run anyone want to co-fund a quantity test on a lot i already own

assay_not_puritylab19:37

unrelated but send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it, take that with a pinch of salt

the queue is posted and updated. if your code is not on it, it did not arrive

are we blinding this one or does the lab know the source

do you want the vial reconstituted or as powder

😂1🤝1

power_through_no 19:44

code not name

code  compound      submitted   status
R-01  semaglutide   2026-02-14  reported
R-02  tirzepatide   2026-02-14  reported
R-03  retatrutide   2026-02-16  in queue
R-04  reference std 2026-02-16  reported

VialBotbot21:49

Recon calculator: 10mg in 5ml = 4mg/ml.

area_percentlab22:25

i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests