vialroom

#lab-requests 2025-09-01

Monday37 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • tail_factor — are we blinding this one or does the lab know the source 16:02
  • zoya_zeros — if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer 16:53
  • zoya_zeros — we do not help with wording beyond that and the mods are strict about it 16:56
  • void_volume — a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement, still working it out 17:09
  • mag_citrate — anyone want to co-fund a quantity test on a lot i already own 17:26

are we blinding this one or does the lab know the source

💀13🧊14🧪2
TF

chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup

SN

powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control

send powder

whats the current turnaround, last one took 18 days

dont send your only vial

ZZ

do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt

if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer

🔥4🎉3🧊7

we do not help with wording beyond that and the mods are strict about it

📉1👍6⚠️1

including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process

coming back after 6 months, is the submission process the same

is there a submission going out this month and can i get in on it

thats the turnaround

VV

quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not
if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer

update from 26 months ago: the blinding process is unchanged and it has held up fine

a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement, still working it out

👀12🙏15⚠️2

the queue is posted and updated. if your code is not on it, it did not arrive

OO

two labs on the same lot is a luxury but it is how we learned what inter-lab variance looks like

OO

we publish the raw report. summaries hide the thing you needed to see

i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones

Janoshik has been the fastest for us. VendorInvestigate has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab

MC

anyone want to co-fund a quantity test on a lot i already own

🙏6

coming back to this declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is, your mileage will differ

LL

i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests, not advice obviously

how do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial

TF

submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust

is it worth including a reference standard in the batch

TF

genuine question the split works from about 8 people. below that everyone pays more than the test is worth

LL

we have never had a lab mix up a sample. we have had members mix up their own labelling twice, someone check my working