vialroom

#lab-requests 2025-08-05

Tuesday34 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • forty_five_kg — quick one submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust 19:25
  • blind_submit — send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it 19:38
  • forty_five_kg — ok so a pooled result tells you about the pool. it does not tell you about your vial 20:20
  • mhra_unlicensed — how much sample does the lab need for purity plus quantity 20:39
CO

we publish the raw report. summaries hide the thing you needed to see, i have it written down somewhere

FF

powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control

FF

update from 22 months ago: the blinding process is unchanged and it has held up fine

FF

including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process

🎉3

quick one submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust

👀15🔥18

if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer

genuine question a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement

BS

send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it

🤝16
BS

turnaround has been between 16 days and twice that depending on the queue

do you want the vial reconstituted or as powder

CO

sorry to jump in i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests

dont send your only vial

😂113
CO

add a standard

medutest-report-sg-1177.pdf
3 pages · 87 KB · not retained in the public archive

we do not help with wording beyond that and the mods are strict about it, ill dig out the number

ok so a pooled result tells you about the pool. it does not tell you about your vial

👀2⚠️3
FF

i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing

CO

the queue is posted and updated. if your code is not on it, it did not arrive
i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests

coordinating this round

🔥6❤️16
GG

we have never had a lab mix up a sample. we have had members mix up their own labelling twice

i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones

in for one

chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup, still working it out

queue is posted

blinded obviously

the split works from about 8 people. below that everyone pays more than the test is worth

GB

update on the earlier thing whats the failure rate on samples actually arriving

genuine question how many people do we need before the split is worth it

whats the split