send powder
#lab-requests 2025-07-21
Monday34 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- taper_or_not — for the archive two labs on the same lot is a luxury but it is how we learned what inter-lab variance looks like 14:18
- ten_of_ten — coming back after 8 months, is the submission process the same 14:57
- gus_charts — declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is 17:48
turnaround has been between 19 days and twice that depending on the queue
medutest-report-g-0641.pdf
3 pages · 753 KB · not retained in the public archive
are we blinding this one or does the lab know the source
PeptideMeter has been the fastest for us. VendorInvestigate has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab
chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup
i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests
Recon calculator: 30mg in 3ml = 8mg/ml.
😂5
is it worth including a reference standard in the batch
for the archive two labs on the same lot is a luxury but it is how we learned what inter-lab variance looks like
🧪4💀9
genuine question is there a submission going out this month and can i get in on it
code not name
including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process
the queue is posted and updated. if your code is not on it, it did not arrive
whats the split
follow up we publish the raw report. summaries hide the thing you needed to see
publish the raw
we do not help with wording beyond that and the mods are strict about it
📉1
coming back after 8 months, is the submission process the same
👀9🤝1🧪11
i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones
🤝3😂6
sorry to jump in do you want the vial reconstituted or as powder
unrelated but do we publish the raw report or a summary
the split works from about 6 people. below that everyone pays more than the test is worth
powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control, for what its worth
🙏1🎉11
anyone want to co-fund a quantity test on a lot i already own
a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement
dont send your only vial
who is coordinating this round
📈10
what happens if a submission gets lost in transit
queue is posted
❤️9🤝2👀11
label the syringe
add a standard
right so a pooled result tells you about the pool. it does not tell you about your vial
how many people do we need before the split is worth it
declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is
✅15👍13