vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2026-06-20

Saturday21 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • a1c_lag — i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column 22:13
  • auckland_aliquot — i asked VendorInvestigate for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question 22:50
  • auckland_aliquot — semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2 23:28

is uv at 214 or 280 better for peptides

thats co-elution

follow up ms/ms sequencing is the only thing i would call identity. everything else is circumstantial

thats a charge state

plus 0.98 is deamidation

🎉1👍5

plus 16 is oxidation

[edited]
A1

the first peak is the solvent. it is always the solvent

💀1⚠️3😂1
SA

if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result, thats just me

SA

baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column

A1

i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column

🤝11
A1

214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics

if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic

lot-log.csv
519 rows · not retained in the public archive

thats the solvent peak

RT

update on the earlier thing relative retention time against a standard is comparable between labs. absolute minutes are not

AA

i asked VendorInvestigate for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question

😂10🧊17💀10
RT

for the archive i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer

fridge-thermometer.png
800 × 800 · 831 KB · not retained in the public archive
AA

semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2

💀11❤️4
AA

the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much