whats a plus one dalton shift usually
#hplc-massspec 2026-05-03
- marrow.mod — coming back after 5 months, what changed in how you read these 18:12
- rowan_reads — integration choices move the number by a few tenths easily. that is most of your inter-lab variance if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength,… 18:39
- rowan_reads — two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly, ymmv i have had a lot where the mass was exactly… 18:55
- VialBot — Reminder set. I will post here in 3 days. 20:19
- bench_notes — oxidation is about plus 15.99 Da and is usually methionine or tryptophan 20:42
the first peak is the solvent. it is always the solvent
update from 10 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything
within inter-lab range
retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily
if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result
update on the earlier thing truncations show as a mass deficit matching one or more residues. you need the sequence to say which
semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2
[edited]update on the earlier thing how do you spot a deletion in a sequence from mass alone
plus 0.98 is deamidation
whats the void volume peak, is that always solvent
plus 16 is oxidation
integration difference
the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much
baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase
thats the solvent peak
does ms/ms actually prove identity or just make it very likely
tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da, so 2+ is near 2407.8 and 3+ near 1605.5
i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer
relative retention time against a standard is comparable between labs. absolute minutes are not
coming back after 5 months, what changed in how you read these
while im here baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column, take that with a pinch of salt
if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks
integration choices move the number by a few tenths easily. that is most of your inter-lab variance
if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks
why does integration change the number so much
two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly, ymmv
i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer
whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size
a dimer usually shows up late and at roughly double the mass. the chromatogram alone will not tell you
has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong
while im here deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant
you need more sample for identity than for purity. plan for that when you post it
a warm transit can put a visible degradant peak on a chromatogram. that is what 4 days at ambient does, thats one data point
i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column, happy to be corrected
show me the spectrum
co-elution is the failure mode that a beautiful single peak is most likely to be hiding
Reminder set. I will post here in 3 days.
a certificate with a number and no chromatogram is asking you to trust the integration you cannot see
oxidation is about plus 15.99 Da and is usually methionine or tryptophan
is uv at 214 or 280 better for peptides
ms/ms or it isnt identity
ms/ms sequencing is the only thing i would call identity. everything else is circumstantial
if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result
need more sample
nobody runs enough blanks, including me
[edited]i have a number at about a third of what i expected, is that a charge state
shallow gradient, i think
can you tell a dimer from the chromatogram alone