vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2026-03-08

Sunday27 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • VialBot — Recon calculator: 30mg in 3ml = 4mg/ml. 14:30
  • VialBot — On this day 4 years ago this channel logged 65 messages. 14:47
  • ollie_orders — two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly 15:16
  • plus_sixteen — deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant 16:12
  • hk_hplc — i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column 16:15
HH

coming back after 6 months, what changed in how you read these

OO

214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics

whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size

VV

semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2

VB

On this day 4 years ago this channel logged 65 messages.

🔥14🧪4
OO

unrelated but is there any point running a blank if the sample is the question

two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly

8
OO

while im here does ms/ms actually prove identity or just make it very likely

integration choices move the number by a few tenths easily. that is most of your inter-lab variance

deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant

2😂7🧊2

show me the spectrum

peak   RRT    area%    note
  1   0.42     0.31    solvent front
  2   0.88     0.44    related substance
  3   1.00    98.72    main
  4   1.14     0.53    related substance
HH

i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column

🧊10🎉14
HH

truncations show as a mass deficit matching one or more residues. you need the sequence to say which

a warm transit can put a visible degradant peak on a chromatogram. that is what 14 days at ambient does

follow up is uv at 214 or 280 better for peptides

HH

ms/ms sequencing is the only thing i would call identity. everything else is circumstantial

i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer