vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2025-08-17

Sunday19 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • two_ml_two — i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column 18:05
  • VialBot — New independent result logged — SWB, lot F-1330, purity 97.4% (PeptideMeter). 18:53
  • VialBot — Reminder for two_ml_two: dose day is today. Set 3 days ago. 19:43
  • monoisotopic — baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column, take that with a pinch of salt 20:20
TM

i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column

😂11
TM

tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da, so 2+ is near 2407.8 and 3+ near 1605.5

VB

New independent result logged — SWB, lot F-1330, purity 97.4% (PeptideMeter).

TM

deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant

VB

Reminder for two_ml_two: dose day is today. Set 3 days ago.

*VendorInvestigate not the other one

TM

i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer, ymmv

TM

has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong

MO

if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks

baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column, take that with a pinch of salt

TM

update from 17 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything

TM

214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics

retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily

22:53tenpence pinned a message