retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily
#hplc-massspec 2025-07-25
- triumph_watch — ok so how would a truncation sequence show up 16:27
- pinch_not_stretch — update from 25 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything, we shall see deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da.… 16:55
- VialBot — Assay note: JEEP lot B-0114 reported at 96.8% of label content. 18:06
- monoisotopic — the first peak is the solvent. it is always the solvent 18:21
- monoisotopic — follow up do you trust an area percent from a shallow gradient 19:08
monoisotopic and average diverge more the bigger the molecule. say which one you are quoting
ok so how would a truncation sequence show up
run a blank
shallow gradients hide related substances behind the main peak. a steeper one separates and looks worse, honestly
ok so you need more sample for identity than for purity. plan for that when you post it, ill dig out the number
update from 25 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything, we shall see
deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant
does ms/ms actually prove identity or just make it very likely
how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity
if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks
whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size
integration difference
how do you tell co-elution from a clean single peak
while im here has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong
semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2, i think
Assay note: JEEP lot B-0114 reported at 96.8% of label content.
thats co-elution
the first peak is the solvent. it is always the solvent
tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da, so 2+ is near 2407.8 and 3+ near 1605.5
does retention time on its own tell you what the compound is
need more sample
within inter-lab range
i have a number at about a third of what i expected, is that a charge state
follow up do you trust an area percent from a shallow gradient
[edited]baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column
nobody runs enough blanks, including me