vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2025-07-05

Saturday49 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • acetate_ash — baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase 15:33
  • gradient_greg — follow up my peak has a shoulder on it, what does that usually mean 15:34
  • hk_hplc — update on the earlier thing how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity 16:20
  • VialBot — Channel stats, last 30 days: 93 messages from 28 members. 16:30
  • salt_bridge — whats a plus one dalton shift usually 19:01
TA

deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant

AA

the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much

AA

baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase

🎉18
GG

follow up my peak has a shoulder on it, what does that usually mean

site-rotation-map.png
1000 × 700 · 908 KB · not retained in the public archive
🤝6😂12📉1

need more sample

integration difference

214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics, take that with a pinch of salt

MO

update on the earlier thing whats the void volume peak, is that always solvent

HH

update on the earlier thing how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity

🎉6🤝8
HH

baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column
i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer

VB

Channel stats, last 30 days: 93 messages from 28 members.

🎉16😂9

Channel stats, last 30 days: 63 messages from 53 members.

NN

i have a number at about a third of what i expected, is that a charge state

follow up i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column

VB

Channel stats, last 30 days: 85 messages from 43 members.

NN

if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic, ill dig out the number
i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column

NN

retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily

whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size

a shoulder on a peak is information, and usually bad information

retention time is a hint

TA

for the archive coming back after 25 months, what changed in how you read these

TA

for the archive semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2, ymmv

RT

i asked Medutest for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question

NN

if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks, ask me again in a month

how do you tell co-elution from a clean single peak

SB

does retention time on its own tell you what the compound is

HH

if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result

HH

monoisotopic and average diverge more the bigger the molecule. say which one you are quoting

HH

has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong

genuine question integration choices move the number by a few tenths easily. that is most of your inter-lab variance

GG

plus 0.98 is deamidation

peak   RRT    area%    note
  1   0.42     0.31    solvent front
  2   0.88     0.44    related substance
  3   1.00    98.72    main
  4   1.14     0.53    related substance
👀5📈18🧊17