vialroom

#dosing-titration 2024-08-05

Monday40 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • quiet.hours — ok so my titration ladder took 15 months to climb and i would do it slower again 18:33
  • slow.taper — small steps are better than big ones and the only reason people take big ones is impatience 18:55
  • slow.taper — update from 10 months ago: held at the same dose the whole time and still losing slowly 19:02

i went up too fast and im paying for it, do i drop back or ride it out

how long did you hold at 2.4 before you moved up

after a gap of more than about three weeks i restart one rung lower. thats my own rule, not advice, from memory

🙏3🤝1😂5

whats a sensible maintenance dose after a year at treatment dose

QH

quick one i jumped a rung once to catch up after a supply gap and it was a bad week. would not repeat

QH

ok so my titration ladder took 15 months to climb and i would do it slower again

🤝3👀14❤️10
QH

i escalate on symptoms. if the current dose is still doing something i stay on it

the ladder in the trials is a starting point, not a schedule you owe anyone

hold

small steps are better than big ones and the only reason people take big ones is impatience

⚠️81😂11

i drifted from sunday to wednesday over a year and only noticed when i checked the log

update from 10 months ago: held at the same dose the whole time and still losing slowly

Cited study
Effect of Continued Weekly Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance (STEP 4)
JAMA · 2021
The withdrawal arm. This is the trial to read before you plan to stop.
😂9
NT

my rule: if a side effect is still there at day five, i hold. if it clears by day three, i step

HH

what does the room think about jumping a rung to catch up

💀6
19:23quiet.hours pinned a message to this channel
HH

for the archive anyone here split their weekly into two and would they do it again

for the archive the people who do best here are almost always the ones going slowest, i have it written down somewhere

NT

a missed week does not reset you, but going straight back to the top dose after a gap is how people get floored

HL

anyone tracked whether a smaller more frequent dose changed their side effects

WZ

the honest answer is that most of us are running protocols nobody has ever studied

while im here the trials escalated on a fixed schedule because a trial has to. you are not a trial
i escalate on symptoms. if the current dose is still doing something i stay on it

whats the longest anyone has stayed on one dose

HL

split dosing has no trial behind it. people here do it and report on it, thats all

slightly off topic but the argument for splitting is a flatter curve. the argument against is you have doubled your injections for a guess, take that with a pinch of salt

Trial scheduleWhat most people here do
Step interval4 weeks, fixed4-12 weeks, on symptoms
Holdingprotocol deviationnormal and expected
Top dosereached by designoften never reached
Coming downnot studiedcommon at maintenance

too early imo

VB

Digest for the week of 2024-04-30 has been published.

🧪2🧊2
HH

do you tell your prescriber you held or do you just hold

ST

nobody here can tell you what dose to be on and the ones who try get corrected

WZ

you do not have to escalate at all. that is a real option that gets forgotten

LA

stepping back down on purpose is a completely reasonable move and this channel should say so more often