vialroom

#coa-reading 2026-05-26

Tuesday16 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • nordic_price_nils — water content is why an honest 10mg vial assays at 9.1. karl fischer titration, and most certificates omit it 17:29
  • nordic_price_nils — no lot number, no certificate. a document you cannot tie to the vial in your hand is decoration, your mileage will differ 17:42
  • closer_not_simpler — update on the earlier thing if the certificate date precedes the lot date, ask. sometimes it is sloppiness and sometimes it is not 18:41
  • LC_MS_Lena — tfa counterion runs higher by mass than acetate. if the certificate does not say, you cannot do the mass balance 18:46
  • LC_MS_Lena — a supplier certificate on its own is a starting point, not evidence. that is the whole reason the verification channel exists 18:54
NP

if you only read one line on a certificate, read the lot number. if you read two, read the assay

NP

water content is why an honest 10mg vial assays at 9.1. karl fischer titration, and most certificates omit it

KK

coming back after 6 months, has the pinned reading guide changed

NP

no lot number, no certificate. a document you cannot tie to the vial in your hand is decoration, your mileage will differ

i have never seen a research certificate with an endotoxin result on it. not once

does anyone keep a folder of certificates to compare over time

CN

update on the earlier thing if the certificate date precedes the lot date, ask. sometimes it is sloppiness and sometimes it is not

🎉12

*Medutest not the other one

LM

tfa counterion runs higher by mass than acetate. if the certificate does not say, you cannot do the mass balance

📈15
LM

nobody can authenticate a certificate from a scan. you authenticate the material by testing it yourself

a supplier certificate on its own is a starting point, not evidence. that is the whole reason the verification channel exists

LM

should a certificate say which instrument and method they used