vialroom

#coa-reading 2026-04-11

Saturday23 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • VialBot — New independent result logged — FGP, lot KP-0925, purity 97.4% (PeptideMeter). 22:44
  • the_bet_2026 — purity is what fraction of the contents is the target. assay is how many mg are actually there. different questions 23:19
  • same_chromato — the certificate from WWB is the one i use to teach this because it actually has a populated impurity table 23:40
SC

i asked JEEP for the method and they sent it. that alone put them ahead of most

VB

New independent result logged — FGP, lot KP-0925, purity 97.4% (PeptideMeter).

🎉7
SC

the retention time on this one is different from the last lot, problem

NW

coming back to this is water content normally on a certificate or do you have to ask

sorry to jump in an identical chromatogram on two different lots is the single biggest tell there is

residual solvents matter more than people think for anything that went through a lot of purification steps

not detected means nothing

two certificates from the same supplier have an identical chromatogram, is that normal

KF

a supplier certificate on its own is a starting point, not evidence. that is the whole reason the verification channel exists

[edited]
TB

purity is what fraction of the contents is the target. assay is how many mg are actually there. different questions

🧊7🎉13📈4

quick one tfa counterion runs higher by mass than acetate. if the certificate does not say, you cannot do the mass balance

PF

sterility and endotoxin are separate tests and almost nobody runs either on research material

SC

the certificate from WWB is the one i use to teach this because it actually has a populated impurity table

why would a vial be 99 pure and still assay under label

gross mass on a jewellery scale plus the water content is enough to catch most underfills, still working it out

SC

the honest summary is that a certificate tells you what the supplier says about a lot they chose to test