vialroom

#coa-reading 2026-02-26

Thursday22 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • travel_cooler — the certificate from GL Biochem is the one i use to teach this because it actually has a populated impurity table 00:12
  • travel_cooler — sorry to jump in tfa counterion runs higher by mass than acetate. if the certificate does not say, you cannot do the mass balance 00:31
  • dana_titrates — quick one i was wrong about this for a year: area percent under-reports nothing, it just answers a different question than assay does 02:28
PT

if you only read one line on a certificate, read the lot number. if you read two, read the assay

TC

the certificate from GL Biochem is the one i use to teach this because it actually has a populated impurity table

tfa or acetate, how do i tell from the paperwork

sorry to jump in tfa counterion runs higher by mass than acetate. if the certificate does not say, you cannot do the mass balance

the related substances table is the interesting part. a row of "not detected" means they did not look hard

certificate is dated before the lot date, is that just sloppiness

BR

if the certificate date precedes the lot date, ask. sometimes it is sloppiness and sometimes it is not

TC

whats the minimum a certificate has to have before you take it seriously

net peptide is gross mass minus water minus counterion. that is why 11.4mg of powder can be a correct 10mg vial, anyway

OO

residual solvents matter more than people think for anything that went through a lot of purification steps

DT

quick one i was wrong about this for a year: area percent under-reports nothing, it just answers a different question than assay does

is water content normally on a certificate or do you have to ask

does purity by hplc at one wavelength miss things