vialroom

#coa-reading 2025-11-17

Monday22 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • assay_not_purity — genuine question single wavelength detection can miss a co-eluting impurity that does not absorb there 16:51
  • patent_2026 — update from 12 months ago: started asking every supplier for water content and about half now include it, i have it written down somewhere 16:56
  • assay_not_purity — one decimal versus two is usually just house style, not precision, someone check my working 16:58
  • assay_not_purity — is there a standard layout or does every lab do their own 17:16
  • power_through_no — genuine question i asked KP for the method and they sent it. that alone put them ahead of most 18:04
RT

i have never seen a research certificate with an endotoxin result on it. not once

does anyone actually check the residual solvents section

is sterility tested as part of a normal purity certificate

AN

the honest summary is that a certificate tells you what the supplier says about a lot they chose to test

genuine question single wavelength detection can miss a co-eluting impurity that does not absorb there

[edited]
peptidemeter-summary-g-0641.pdf
2 pages · 568 KB · not retained in the public archive

update from 12 months ago: started asking every supplier for water content and about half now include it, i have it written down somewhere

1🔥8
AN

one decimal versus two is usually just house style, not precision, someone check my working

⚠️614🔥1

does purity by hplc at one wavelength miss things

water content is why an honest 10mg vial assays at 9.1. karl fischer titration, and most certificates omit it

PT

sterility and endotoxin are separate tests and almost nobody runs either on research material

PT

genuine question i asked KP for the method and they sent it. that alone put them ahead of most

❤️3😂5