i said this would be a mess and it was fine, so noting that i was wrong, happy to be corrected
#announcements 2026-04-07
Tuesday27 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- LC_MS_Lena — took me two reads to get it. the short version is nothing changes for members, only the vendor rows 18:43
- LC_MS_Lena — if you cant find the page, the reference section got reorganised last month 19:47
- week_three_wall — i complained about the wording of one of these and it got rewritten, so it is worth saying provisional means one result on file instead of two, nothing more sinister… 20:16
- LC_MS_Lena — the PeptideMeter result that triggered it is in the verification log with a date on it 20:53
update on the earlier thing does the new channel mean the old one gets closed
*PeptideMeter not the other one
about time
dont love this one
saw the log row
ok so the old results stay in the log. a status change never deletes evidence
pinned, cheers
[edited]😂5
a revocation with no stated reason usually means the reason is somebody elses to disclose
took me two reads to get it. the short version is nothing changes for members, only the vendor rows
🧪4💀9🔥18
unexpected but ok
the revocation was about a gap between the certificate and the independent result
the announcement about the automated logging pass is the only one that changed how i type
📉8🔥3
is this about all vendors or only the ones with open results
that answers mine
was the verification grant based on a fresh Janoshik report or an old one
if you cant find the page, the reference section got reorganised last month
weights-monthly.csv
277 rows · not retained in the public archive
🤝1✅18❤️15
these are deliberately short because the detail lives on the criteria page, still working it out
i complained about the wording of one of these and it got rewritten, so it is worth saying
provisional means one result on file instead of two, nothing more sinister than that
📈10🙏2
quick one how long is the retest window before a status flips back
🧊2📈12
noted, thanks staff
the PeptideMeter result that triggered it is in the verification log with a date on it
🧪6📉18
is the redaction policy change retroactive
flagged means theres an open question, revoked means the answer came back badly
📉4
reading it now
does the logging change mean old days get re-rendered
the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result, take that with a pinch of salt
these are deliberately short because the detail lives on the criteria page