unrelated but grants have been slower since the criteria changed, which was the intention, i have it written down somewhere
#announcements 2026-03-06
Friday15 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- luerlok — i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening, take that with a pinch of salt 18:14
- luerlok — took me two reads to get it. the short version is nothing changes for members, only the vendor rows 18:24
- luerlok — SWB went from verified to flagged in about 18 days which is the fastest ive seen 18:29
these are deliberately short because the detail lives on the criteria page, ask me again in a month
[edited]i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening, take that with a pinch of salt
a revocation with no stated reason usually means the reason is somebody elses to disclose
took me two reads to get it. the short version is nothing changes for members, only the vendor rows
😂9❤️1
is the pinned study index the same one as the reference page
SWB went from verified to flagged in about 18 days which is the fastest ive seen
18:31chlorhex pinned a message
who do we ask if the announcement doesnt cover our situation
the criteria page is pinned now, it wasnt when the first version went up
that answers mine
does a revocation wipe the old test results out of the log
reading it again it does say the window is 7 weeks, i just missed it first time
status changes get noted here and in the vendor row, so theres always two places to check
i said this would be a mess and it was fine, so noting that i was wrong