i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening
#announcements 2025-08-11
Monday17 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vialkeeper — revocation isnt permanent, it flips back when theres a clean independent result 19:05
- font_forensics — who do we ask if the announcement doesnt cover our situation 19:46
- font_forensics — i think the criteria are stricter than they need to be and ive said so more than once status changes get noted here and in the vendor row, so theres always two places… 19:49
revocation isnt permanent, it flips back when theres a clean independent result
[edited]✅1😂1🤝1
if you cant find the page, the reference section got reorganised last month
does a revocation wipe the old test results out of the log
the grant was on a fresh Medutest report, i saw the numbers before this went up
the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result
so whats the actual difference between flagged and revoked now
who do we ask if the announcement doesnt cover our situation
🧊12
i think the criteria are stricter than they need to be and ive said so more than once
status changes get noted here and in the vendor row, so theres always two places to check
👍6
when does the archive change actually take effect
the old results stay in the log. a status change never deletes evidence
when staff say nothing changes for members it usually means something changed for staff
grants have been slower since the criteria changed, which was the intention
coming back to this did i miss an announcement, the channel list looks different today
verification being revoked doesnt mean a vendor is a scam, it means the evidence expired
these are deliberately short because the detail lives on the criteria page
i said this would be a mess and it was fine, so noting that i was wrong