vialroom

#announcements 2025-05-17

Saturday23 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • rotterdam_recon — took me two reads to get it. the short version is nothing changes for members, only the vendor rows 17:09
  • quiet.hours — will the criteria be pinned or do we have to scroll for them 17:35
  • rotterdam_recon — the new pinned resource is genuinely good, ive used it twice this week already the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next… 19:19
  • rotterdam_recon — verification being revoked doesnt mean a vendor is a scam, it means the evidence expired, i have it written down somewhere 20:29
RR

took me two reads to get it. the short version is nothing changes for members, only the vendor rows

QH

will the criteria be pinned or do we have to scroll for them

📈7📉2
AV

i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening

SI

coming back after 2 months this channel was the only thing i needed to catch up

SI

i asked about my own situation and got an answer in the channel rather than privately

VI

provisional means one result on file instead of two, nothing more sinister than that

RR

i think the criteria are stricter than they need to be and ive said so more than once

RR

the new pinned resource is genuinely good, ive used it twice this week already
the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result

when does the archive change actually take effect

RR

follow up the old results stay in the log. a status change never deletes evidence

20:28quiet.hours pinned a message
RR

verification being revoked doesnt mean a vendor is a scam, it means the evidence expired, i have it written down somewhere

QH

the grant was on a fresh Medutest report, i saw the numbers before this went up

QH

nobody announces a revocation quickly, they sit on it until the paperwork is unambiguous